G1

L-Timer · Human Factor "Six Senses" · G1

Human Factor Management

HRM 20:00

Overview

What Is It?

Human Resource Management (HRM) assigns the right people to roles elaborated in Organization Management (OM), cares about their individual performance deficiencies and their job satisfaction.

Who Does It?

It is advisable to charge someone in team with psychological background to manage the HRM process. Casually project manager misuses HRM to strengthen his position.

Why Is It Important?

People make project done. So, the right role owner decides about the project fate. His performance depends on his capabilities and his motivation. HRM takes care of them.

What Are the Steps?

Verify and close pending process improvements and tasks. If there is a new or changed role – perform the appropriate procedure. If there is unsatisfactory role effectiveness or role owner unsatisfied – start appropriate procedures, too. Candidates’ recruitment including evaluation and personal development best to outsource to professional HRM departments. After verifying all roles check if Change Request or Knowledge Management shall be addressed.

What Is the Work?

Most unlikely you will not find an ideal match for the vacancy. In most cases you must manage projects with role owners already set. You must assess the deficiencies and the probability of improvements with right HRM measures. Balancing acts are the adjustment of formal, informal roles and personal needs of all team members. As people develop with project progress, the HRM must be run perpetually to secure the best feasible team performance.

How Do I Ensure That I Have Done It Right?

Be attentive to personality traits and their impact on role performance. Plan sufficient time to deal with role ownership deficiencies, evaluate thoroughly if personal development might help. Care about people job needs.

Goal

The goal of Human Resource Management is the best possible choice of role owner, continuous monitoring of his performance and personal needs and, if justified, initiation of the appropriate personal development program and results assessment. The sort of evolution on how the project team members are treated, which project management approaches go right now is well reflected by the ambiguity of ISO 21500:2012 standard (ISO 21500:2012 2012).

Those who directly contribute to project are named without distinction: team (with and without project manager), stakeholders, personnel, resources or human resources, leading to incongruent treatment of all those people in a project. The processes in standard cover:
4.3.15. Establish project team. Staff of the project, selecting the role owners, in the group if Initiation processes
4.3.16. Develop project team, focused on motivation and performance, not distinguishing personal and team performances (Implementation processes’ group)
4.3.20. Manage project team: again the (team) performance is treated (Controlling processes’ group)
The disparity may result in overall loss of efficiency. The personal needs of team members are not considered. The process presented in this Chapter streamlines all the requirements related to a role owner in a single, unambiguous approach.

Process

Firstly, try to finalize all hanging issues, before you take on the new or changed role. If there is one – start the assignment procedure. Next check the efficiency of the role owner as seen by the management and adversely verify the team member satisfaction. Repeat until all roles are verified. Suggest changes, store knowledge and reenter the process periodically

Human Factor Management diagram

Further Readings

Armstrong M (2006) Handbook of human resource practice, 10th edn. Kogan Page, London

Belbin M (2010) The management of teams, why they succeed or fail, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford

Boehm BW (1981) Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

Cadle J, Yeates D (eds) (2008) Project management for information systems, 5th edn. Pearson/ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

CAPT (2013) Estimated frequencies of the types in the United States population. http://www.capt. org/mbti-assessment/estimated-frequencies.htm . Accessed 13 Feb 2013

Czikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New York

DeMarco T, Lister T (1999) Peopleware: productive projects and teams, 2nd edn. Dorset House, New York

Denisow K (1999) Soziale Strukturen, Gruppen und Team. In: Rationalisierungskuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. (Hrsg) Projekt management Fachmann, Band 1, 5. Auflage, Eschborn

Eysenck PJ, Eysenck MW (1985) Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. Plenum Press, New York

Fleming H (1981) Hemispheral lateralization: implication for understanding consumer behaviour. J Consum Res Vol. 8, No 1. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Galewicz W (2010) Moralnos´c´ i profesjonalizm. Spo´r o pozycje˛ etyk zawodowych. TAiWPN Universitas Krako´w, Krakow

Glowitz F (1999) Motivation. In: Rationalisierungskuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. (Hrsg) Projektmanagement Fachmann, Band 1, 5. Auflage, Eschborn

Grimshaw D, Rubery J (2007) Economics and HRM. In: Boxall P, Purcell J, Wright P (eds) Oxford handbook of hu-man resource management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Heckhausen H et al (1987) Jenseits des Rubikon. Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften. Springer, Berlin

Helgadottir H (2008) The ethical dimension of project management. Int J Proj Manag Vol. 26. Elsevier, London

Herzberg FI (1987) One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harv Bus Rev 65 No. 5. Harvard Business Publishing, Boston

Hogan R (2007) Personality and the fate of organisations. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mawah

Holland JL (1997) Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

ISO 21500:2012 (2012d) Guidance on project management, ICS 03.100.40. ISO, Geneva

Lent B (2012) Rola wartos´ci humanizmu integralnego w prowadzeniu projekto´w (Role of integral humanism in project management) in Wspo´łczesne Zarza˛dzanie/Contemporary Management, vol 2012(2). Jagiellonian University Press, Krako´w

Litke H (2007) Projektmanagement. Methoden, Techniken, Verhaltensweisen. Evolutiona¨res Projektmanagement. 5 erweitere Auflage. Carl Hansen Verlag, Mu¨nchen

Maslow AH (1954) Motivation and personality. Harper and Row, New York

McConnell S (1998) Software project survival guide: how to be sure your first important project isn’t your last. Microsoft Press, Redmond

McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Personal Soc Psychol Vol. 52, No 1, APA, Washington

McGinnis AL (1985) Bringing out the best in people: how to enjoy helping others. Excel Augsburg Publishing House, Minneapolis

Meyer H (2003) Personalwirtschaft und Projektmanagement. In: Rationalisierungskuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. (Hrsg) Projektmanagement Fachmann, Band 2, 7. Auflage, Eschborn

Myers-Briggs I, Myers PB (1980/1995) Gifts differing: understanding personality type. Reprinted 1995. Davies-Black, Mountain View

Scheler M (1994) Schriften zur Anthropologie, M. Arndt, P. Reclam, Stuttgart

Schnelle, Eberhard, Hrsg.(1982) Metaplan-Gespra¨chstechnik. Kommunikationswerkzeug fu¨r die Gruppenarbeit, Metaplan GmbH, Quickborn

Seiler S, Lent B (2005) Kommunikationsfa¨hig, spezialisiert und kompetent. HR Today No 7/ 8_2005, Jobindex Media AG, Zurich/New York

Spranger E, Pigors PJ (1928) Types of men: the psychology and ethics of personality. M. Niemeyer, Halle

Szczupaczyn´ski J (2009) Sformalizowane standardy etyczne w perspektywie teoretycznej in Wspo´łczesne Zarza˛dzanie/Contemporary Management Vol. 2009 No. 3, Jagiellonian University Press, Krako´w

Wideman RM (1998/2013) Project teamwork, personality profiles and the population at large: do we have enough of the right kind of people? In: Proceedings 29th annual PMI symposium, PMI, Long Beach. http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/profiles/observations.htm. Accessed 13 February 2013

🎼

Practice questions coming soon.