B6

L-Timer · Project Creation and its Stabilization · B6

Problem Solving Management

PBM 12:00

Overview

What is this chapter about?

Sooner or later, every project encounters a serious technical or organizational problem that exceeds routine decision-making capabilities and the planned budget. Problem solving management enables the project to be systematically brought back on track.

To whom is this chapter primarily addressed?

Problem solving is one of the tasks of the project manager. The task may be assigned to a member of the project team or to a specialist from outside the project. In any case, it is advisable to involve those who are directly related to the cause of the problem or affected by its consequences.

What is the significance of the process discussed in the chapter?

Problems cause deviations from the planned course of the project, increase costs and lead to delays. This can have a demotivating effect on the project team, lead to project termination, and even have legal and financial consequences.

How does the process work in practice?

The starting point is to correctly identify the problem and its causes and to pre-cicely describe the target situation. A systematic analysis of possible solutions and the associated risks lead to the selection of the most appropriate solution. Alternatively, in the case of unclear problems, a heuristic approach supported by artificial intelligence may be more effective. The process ends with the initiation of the implementation of the adopted solution.

What are the main challenges?

Reliable identification and assessment of the causes of problems help to prevent them in the future. The optimal solution considers alternative options and potential risks.

What are the key success factors in this process?

Early recognition of the first symptoms of potential problems is essential. Creativity and in-depth knowledge of the product, its environment, and the available technical and organizational capabilities form the foundation for success. Identifying the causes of problems and initiating corrective actions should be carried out with the full involvement of the project team and the support of experts. Half-hearted solutions do more harm than good to the project.

Goal

The objective of the problem-solving management process (PSM) is to permanently eliminate technical and organizational problems within the accepted costs and time frame of the project. This process is carried out cyclically throughout the duration of the project. PSM involves raising the team’s awareness of problem symptoms, identifying problems and developing possible solutions. Effective procedures have been proposed for two classes of problems—well-defined and ill-defined problems, which may also be methodically supported by artificial intelligence. Monitoring and controlling the implementation of the adopted solution are the subject of other relevant processes, depending on the nature of the problem.

Process

In the problem management process, all technical and organizational problems arising in the project are solved in accordance with the project objectives, using appropriate methods and techniques. The knowledge gained during problem solving, recorded in the Knowledge Management process, helps to avoid the same difficulties in the further course of the project.

Problem Solving Management diagram

Lecture notes

Further Readings

Алтшуллер, Г. С. (1969/1973). Алгоритм изобретения. (1st ed. 1969; 2nd ed. 1973) Москва: Московский рабочий.

Алтшуллер, Г. С. (1979). Творчество как точная наука: Теория решения изобретательских задач. Советское радио.

ASQ TQM, (2026). Total quality management (TQM) implementation framework. asq.org

ASQ. (2026). Problem solving. https://asq.org/quality-resources/problem-solving

Bergfeld, H. (2003). Kreativitätstechniken. In Rationalisierungskuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. (Ed.), Projektmanagement Fachmann (Vol. 2, 7th ed.). Eschborn.

Britannica, Heuristic. (2026). Britannica Enc., Document. britannica.com.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harper Business.

Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximise your brain’s untapping potential. Plume.

Casini, G., Dundua, B., & Kutsia, T. (2025). Logics in Artificial Intelligence: 19th European Conference, JELIA 2025, Kutaisi, Georgia, September 1–4, 2025, Proceedings (Part II). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Chang, W., Arcesati, R., & Hmaidi, A. (2026). China’s drive towards self-reliance in artificial intelligence: From chips to large language models. MERICS. merics.org

de Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Penguin.

DeepSeek, China. DeepSeek, DeepSeek, https://www.deepseek.com/en/ (2026).

Earhart, Y. (2025). Math problems ways. Publifye.

English Lehmann Ways of Thinking...

Faiers, R. (2024). Root cause analysis in engineering design. Faiers.

Ghisellini, R., Pareschi, R., Pedroni, M., & Raggi, G. B. (2025). Recommending actionable strategies: A semantic approach to integrating analytical frameworks with decision heuristics. MDPI.

Gruber, H., Holzer, M., & Rauch, C. (2025). On pumping problems for unary regular languages. In R. Kralovic & V. Kurkova (Eds.), SOFSEM 2025: Theory and practice of computer science (pp. xx–xx). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Grünig, R., & Kühn, R. (2025). Solving complex decision problems: A heuristic process (5th ed.). Springer.

Holt, K. (2026). Hybrid intelligence: Merging collective and artificial intelligence to solve complex problems. Routledge.

Holzner, N., Maier, S., & Feuerriegel, S. (2025). Generative AI and creativity: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

IBM. (2026). Cognitive computing vs. AI: Key differences. IBM Think. ibm.com

Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? Prentice Hall.

ISO. (2012). ISO 21500:2012 – Guidance on project management. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO. (2020). ISO 21502:2020 – Project, programme and portfolio management: Guidance on project management. International Organization for Standardization.

Jablonski, M. (2025). Socio-technical systems in the shaping and development of digital business models. CRC Press.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar.

Lent, B. (2025). Cognition, consciousness and intuition in project management. Scientific Papers of the Silesian University of Technology.

Liedtka, J. (2018). Why does design thinking work? Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72–79.

Maglogiannis, I., Iliadis, L., & Andreou, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations: 21st IFIP WG 12.5 International Conference AIAI 2025 Proceedings (Part I). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Mayer, O. (2025). TRIZ-Anwendertag 2024. Springer.

Minevich, M. (2025). Global artificial intelligence report. IDCA. https://www.idc-a.org

Miskioglu, E., Martin, K., & Carberry, A. (2025). The critical role of intuition in problem solving. In L. English & T. Lehmann (Eds.), Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. Routledge.

Morgenstrahl, R. (2019). Intuition: Theory and practical application. BoD.

OECD. (2023). Artificial intelligence in science: Challenges, opportunities and the future of research. OECD Publishing.

OpenAU. ChatGPT 4.0, OpenAI, https://chatgpt.com (2026).

Pannenbäcker, O. (2003). Methoden zur Problemlösung. In Rationalisierungskuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. (Ed.), Projektmanagement Fachmann (Vol. 2, 7th ed.). Eschborn.

Phadis, N., & Torkkeli, M. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of generative AI in TRIZ: A comparative study. In D. Cavallucci, P. Livotov, & S. Brad (Eds.), TRIZ Future Conference Proceedings. Springer.

Plattner, H. (2023). An introduction to design thinking process guide. Stanford University d.school.

Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J. F., Breazeal, C., & Wellman, M. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486.

Riva, G. (2025). The architecture of cognitive amplification: Enhanced cognitive scaffolding as a resolution to the comfort-growth paradox in human-AI cognitive integration.

Roth, B., Streif, H., & Thelle, Y. (Eds.). (2024). Problemlösen in der Tradition von Pólya. WTM.

Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Free Press.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.

Skalfist, P., Mikelsten, D., & Teigens, V. (2025). Artificial intelligence: The fourth industrial revolution. Cambridge Stanford Books.

Trump, D. (2025). Winning the race: America’s AI action plan. The White House.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Venn, J. (2013). On the diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions and reasonings. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science., Vol 1880, upenn.edu

Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence for decision making. Springer.

Yoe, C. (2025). The art of making decisions under uncertainty. CRC Press.

Zhai, C., Wu, J., Li, P., & Sun, Y. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on cognitive abilities. Smart Learning Environments.

Zhou, W., Li, X., & Zhang, T. (2025). Enhancing group creativity with generative AI: Experimental evidence. Journal of Creative Behavior.

🎼

Practice questions coming soon.